Re: Is this a bug? (changing sequences in default value)

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Fernando Schapachnik" <fernando(at)mecon(dot)gov(dot)ar>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is this a bug? (changing sequences in default value)
Date: 2008-05-13 15:26:52
Message-ID: b42b73150805130826v21cbee04q546b2355e32da555@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Fernando Schapachnik
<fernando(at)mecon(dot)gov(dot)ar> wrote:
> > > ALTER SEQUENCE name [ INCREMENT [ BY ] increment ]
> > > [ MINVALUE minvalue | NO MINVALUE ] [ MAXVALUE maxvalue | NO
> > > MAXVALUE ]
> > > [ RESTART [ WITH ] start ] [ CACHE cache ] [ [ NO ] CYCLE ]
> >
> > oop, you are using 8.1 :-). This was added in a later version. drop
> > sequence ... cascade should probably work. you can try it out in a
> > transaction to be sure.
>
> Thanks for your help, but cascade doesn't make a difference.

What do you mean? PostgreSQL 8.1 has 'drop sequence cascade':
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-dropsequence.html

If this isn't working, can you paste the text of the error message?

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wall 2008-05-13 15:27:47 Re: pg_standby / WAL archive-restore through system restarts
Previous Message David Fetter 2008-05-13 15:23:34 Re: Making sure \timing is on