Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Date: 2008-04-08 18:04:32
Message-ID: b42b73150804081104i35fc7ef2x7a2fc4a41c1cbeaa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think you should conduct a wider survey before you make that decision.
> > In particular, I'd like to hear from driver writers like Greg Sabino
> > Mullane and Jeff Davis, as well as regular libpq users.
>
> I can state that there would be almost zero chance this would ever be
> used by DBD::Pg, as it would seem to add overhead with no additional
> functionality over what we already have. Unless I'm misreading what it
> does and someone can make the case why I should use it.

does DBD::pg move arrays in and out of the server? do you parse them
yourself? if you answer yes to either question you should take a
second look.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-04-08 18:28:18 Re: temp tables should not have pg_shdepend entries
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-04-08 18:03:54 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-04-08 18:32:12 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-04-08 18:03:54 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a