Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Chris Mair" <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org>
Cc: alexei(dot)vladishev(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date: 2006-10-15 16:30:45
Message-ID: b42b73150610150930l142b82b5q36e1f8493ef112bf@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 10/14/06, Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org> wrote:
> The interesting part is the graph that shows updates / sec real time
> vs. running total of updates:
> http://www.1006.org/misc/20061014_pgupdates_bench/results.png

one small thing: the variances inside the trendline are caused by
using integer timestamps...each slanted line is one second. The blue
line has a very slight wobble which is the effects of the vacuum..its
very slight. Actually in this test it would probably be good to
vacuum extremely often, like every 100 records or so.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A. Kretschmer 2006-10-15 16:35:27 Re: How to make a copy of schema
Previous Message Andrus 2006-10-15 16:10:53 How to make a copy of schema

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mark 2006-10-15 16:32:32 Re: Postgresql Caching
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-10-15 16:30:11 Re: postgres database crashed