| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) |
| Date: | 2013-08-23 19:54:34 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.02.1308232150470.3533@localhost6.localdomain6 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> For example, if you had foo(point) and much later you want to add
> foo(box), someone might complain that foo('(1,2)') has worked for many
> releases now, and how common is that use? If we had started out with
> foo(point) and foo(line) simultaneously, this wouldn't have become a
> problem.
You may provide foo(TEXT) along foo(box) so that foo('(1,2)') works as it
did before.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-08-23 20:02:24 | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-08-23 19:17:23 | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |