| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Maciej Gajewski <maciej(dot)gajewski0(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unsigned integer types |
| Date: | 2013-05-29 17:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.02.1305291942590.25496@localhost6.localdomain6 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I agree that extensions are undermarketed. Although pgxn is a good step,
I could not find it from "postgresql.org":-(
> I propose to not integrate the unsigned types into existing promotion
> hierarchy, and behave just like gcc would with -Werror: require
> explicit cast. Between them, the unsigned types would be automatically
> converted up (uint2 > uint4 > uint8).
If you do it, having uint1 (1 byte) would be nice as well.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abhishek Rai | 2013-05-29 18:45:21 | Re: pg_stat_replication when standby is unreachable |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-05-29 17:40:48 | Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited |