> My thinking is that what pgbench should do is:
> * track an error count
> * if it finds an error, don't increment the transaction count, but do
> increment the error count.
> * then continue to the next transaction.
>
> Does that seem like the right approach?
Could it retry the *same* transaction instead of the next one?
Should it give up trying under some conditions, say there are more errors
than transactions?
--
Fabien.