| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance |
| Date: | 2005-06-03 00:57:02 |
| Message-ID: | af408ee101ce05f7b84e7397c67981a1@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Something ain't kosher. I tried the same test with the latest and greatest
DBI, DBD::Pg, and PostgreSQL, tuned everything up, and still got around
10,000 transactions per minute or so. There is no way MySQL is doing an
order of magnitude or more better than that and using properly transactioned
inserts.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200506022050
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFCn6mavJuQZxSWSsgRAq4JAJ9SszAYi6i+RhhS0AQTLGr/+JqI6ACgk9Dj
3qXjrSk1nnh4vdnGmY/R3e0=
=kJkK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-03 01:03:12 | Re: SQL call to get pid of current connection |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-06-03 00:47:12 | Re: SQL call to get pid of current connection |