| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. |
| Date: | 2017-01-25 05:04:30 |
| Message-ID: | aece0e63-8291-dda5-ad29-5f6e3b808e62@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/24/17 4:56 AM, Beena Emerson wrote:
> 2. buff_dump_interval could be renamed to just dump_interval or
> buffer_dump_interval. Also, since it is now part of pg_prewarm. I think
> it makes sense to have the conf parameter be: pg_prewarm.xxx instead of
> pg_autoprewarm.xxx
I'd really like to find terminology other than "buffer dump", because
that makes it sound like we're dumping the contents of the buffers
themselves.
Maybe block_map? Buffer_map?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-01-25 05:06:16 | Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-01-25 05:02:25 | Re: Checksums by default? |