Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown

From: Clodoaldo <clodoaldo(dot)pinto(dot)neto(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Sim Zacks" <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown
Date: 2008-01-13 08:50:48
Message-ID: a595de7a0801130050ye92d410xac788e29a7e40682@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

2008/1/13, Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>:
> How would you rewrite something like:
> WHERE (COALESCE(b.quantity, 0) - COALESCE(b.deliveredsum, 0)) > 0;
> I could write:
> where case when b.quantity is null then 0 else b.quantity end - case when b.deliveredsum is null then 0 else b.deliveredsum end > 0
>
> It is butt ugly, but is that the most efficient way to write it in 8.2.4?

I don't know if the plan would be the same but this is a bit clearer:

WHERE COALESCE(b.quantity, 0) > COALESCE(b.deliveredsum, 0)

Regards, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sim Zacks 2008-01-13 08:58:01 Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown
Previous Message henry 2008-01-13 06:40:34 Re: tcp_keepalives_idle ignored

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sim Zacks 2008-01-13 08:58:01 Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown
Previous Message Warren Turkal 2008-01-13 08:22:37 Re: timestamp refactor effort