Re: Syntax for partitioning

From: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Devrim GNDZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
Date: 2009-11-02 06:02:07
Message-ID: a301bfd90911012202q1367ece8j392d26b5299a8744@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

>> Is this the same as / similar to Oracle's syntax?
>
> Yes.
>
>> IIRC Nikhil's patch was Oracle's syntax
>
> No. See:
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_7002.htm#i2125922
>

Any decent prevalent partitioning syntax should be ok IMHO. IIRC,
MySQL paritioning syntax is also pretty similar to Oracle's.

Regards,
Nikhils
--
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-11-02 06:11:05 Re: Error on compile for Windows
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-11-02 04:27:59 Re: proposal: operator exclusion constraints with cardinality