Remove me from your email chain.
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:44:34 +0100
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Need Some Recent Information on the Differences between Postgres and MySql
> From: dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org
> To: andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com
> CC: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:22 AM, A. Kretschmer
> <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> wrote:
> > In response to Dave Page :
> >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Didn't PostgreSQL used to have more than 1 storage engine in the past?
> >> > I thought I read somewhere it did, but it was decided it was a
> >> > compromise on stability and/or quality, so ended up using a single
> >> > kick-ass engine?
> >>
> >> Yes, many, many moons ago.
> >
> > Really? Do you have a link?
>
> Hmm, I think I misread Thom's question. The smgr API used to be far
> more rigidly designed as I understand it, to allow the possibility of
> having different storage engines (for example, maybe one that used raw
> devices). I don't know that any other storage engines were ever
> actually written though.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now