Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)

From: Jeremy Drake <pgsql-patches(at)jdrake(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Date: 2006-07-02 19:12:12
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0607021208340.31620@frousa
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

> Nah, it was a false alarm: I was looking at the first post-patch report,
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mongoose&dt=2006-07-02%2003:30:01
> but apparently mongoose had managed to pick up a partially-updated
> snapshot. The later reports (including mongoose's own next try an
> hour later) were all OK.

As the keeper of mongoose, is there anything I should do to prevent it
from picking up a partially-updated snapshot? Or is this just a race
condition that's bound to happen now and then?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-02 19:48:24 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-02 18:50:18 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Do a pass of code review for the

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-02 19:48:24 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-02 16:34:36 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)