Re: two disks - best way to use them?

From: David Lang <dlang(at)invendra(dot)net>
To: Thomas Harold <tgh(at)tgharold(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: two disks - best way to use them?
Date: 2005-12-06 03:54:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.62.0512051950560.2807@qnivq.ynat.uz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Thomas Harold wrote:

> Yeah, I don't think I was clear about the config. It's (4) disks setup as a
> pair of RAID1 sets. My original config was pgsql on the first RAID set (data
> and WAL). I'm now experimenting with putting the data/pg_xlog folder on the
> 2nd set of disks.
>
> Under the old setup (everything on the original RAID1 set, in a dedicated
> 32GB LVM volume), I was seeing 80-90% wait percentages in "top". My
> understanding is that this is an indicator of an overloaded / bottlenecked
> disk system. This was while doing massive inserts into a test table
> (millions of narrow rows). I'm waiting to see what happens once I have
> data/pg_xlog on the 2nd disk set.

in that case you logicly have two disks, so see the post from Ron earlier
in this thread.

David Lang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-06 05:51:13 Re: BLCKSZ
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2005-12-06 03:07:20 Re: 15,000 tables - next step