| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans |
| Date: | 2004-08-25 06:00:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0408251557260.6905@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>
> Greg Stark wrote:
>
> > It's only allowed when the transaction is in READ UNCOMMITTED
> > isolation level.
> >
> >Something Postgres doesn't currently support. In fact I'm not aware of any SQL
> >database that supports it, though I'm sure there's one somewhere.
> >
> >
> >
> FYI - DB2 supports this isolation level, I don't know of any others (tho
> Informix is a possibility).
I wasn't aware pf DB2 supporting it, but SQL Server and Informix do.
Oracle only supports COMMITTED and SERIALIZABLE according to my 10g
manual.
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-08-25 11:29:57 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling |
| Previous Message | Philip Yarra | 2004-08-25 05:57:10 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-08-25 11:29:57 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling |
| Previous Message | Philip Yarra | 2004-08-25 05:57:10 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling |