Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Date: 2003-11-14 12:53:01
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311141352100.3585-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Greg Stark writes:

> Wouldn't at least 0750 be safe? That way putting a user in the postgres group
> would grant him access to be able to browse around and read the files in
> pg_data.

That assumes that there is a restricted postgres group, which is not
guaranteed.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-14 13:08:40 Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Previous Message Greg Stark 2003-11-14 12:27:51 Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-14 13:08:40 Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Previous Message Greg Stark 2003-11-14 12:27:51 Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb