| From: | "Craig O'Shannessy" <craig(at)ucw(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RHEL |
| Date: | 2003-11-13 04:52:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311131551150.14188-100000@mail.ucw.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
So, what ever happened to the "RedHat database"? I though RH was going to
be hiring core PostgreSQL developers? Anyone got a URL to explain what
happened to this venture? Sorry if I'm getting a little OT here.
Craig
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:57 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> writes:
> > > I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can
> > > tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES
>
> > Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about this.
>
> > (Not totally unbiased here ... I'm getting *very* tired about RH's
> > internal indecision about their extent of commitment to Postgres.
> > I think frequent whacks-upside-the-head from paying customers may
> > be the only way to get upper management to sit up and take notice.)
>
> The RHEL3 beta (taroon) had rh-postgresql-server built and included. Does
> RHEL3 not include this package?
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ma Siva Kumar | 2003-11-13 04:56:59 | Re: multibyte support [Resolved] |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-13 04:43:17 | Re: embedded postgresql |