Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)
Date: 2003-09-01 21:37:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309012336330.1206-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark writes:

> Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it's true, but in practice
> why would an OS have some *_r but have only non-thread-safe versions of
> others?

The question is whether configure can reliably identify whether various
*_r functions exist. I think it can't. For example, they could be in a
separate library that we don't know about.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-09-01 21:43:53 Re: massive quotes?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-01 21:24:16 Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?