Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2

From: Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2
Date: 2002-11-30 16:40:04
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0211300838450.4691-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

Speaking of which, what is the recommended optimum setting for
memory buffers?

Thanks,

L.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
>
> Hmmm..... Eric, have you tuned PostgreSQL's memory buffers at all?
>
> :-)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
>
> <snip>
>
>

--
Laurette Cisneros
The Database Group
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
----------------------------------
My other vehicle is my imagination.
- bumper sticker

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-11-30 19:47:45 Re: Low Budget Performance, Part 2
Previous Message Manfred Koizar 2002-11-29 18:24:44 Re: Query performance discontinuity