Groups vs. Roles

From: "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Groups vs. Roles
Date: 2003-12-05 01:23:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0312041708590.4900-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

While playing at a new/different configuration in my brand spanking new Pg
7.4 instance :-) I noticed in the documentation that GROUPs are not in the
SQL Standard. So I go a looking and notice that Oracle does have ROLEs
and that they are quite different in how they are used.
Looking at the TODO list I see there is an entry about adding some
GROUPy stuff so ROLEs can be implemented. How close will ROLEs be with
these (object ownership) features added? Not that I'm in hurry to have
ROLEs but they are SQL Standard so I need to plan for them to happen.
(Actually I'm more interested in TABLESPACEs. :-)

Best,
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Satrapa 2003-12-05 02:45:23 Re: are cursors necessary?
Previous Message pg 2003-12-05 01:21:56 last update time of a table