| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
| Date: | 2003-09-10 21:59:41 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309101559150.17234-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>>>> "AR" == Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com> writes:
>
> AR> Anyone out there using beta 2 in production situations? Comments on
> AR> stability? I am rolling out a project in the next 4 weeks, and really
> AR> don't want to go though an upgrade soon after its released on an
> AR> Unsuspecting Client, so I would LIKE to start working with 7.4.
>
> I'm pondering doing the same, but I'm not 100% sure there won't be any
> dump/restore-required changes to it before it goes gold. From my
> tuning tests I've been running on it, it appears to be extremely fast
> and stable.
Yeah, right now it's looking like the only thing you'll have to do is
reindex hash indexes between beta2 and beta3.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guy Fraser | 2003-09-10 22:34:46 | Re: Picture with Postgres and Delphi |
| Previous Message | Clay Luther | 2003-09-10 21:01:00 | 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never Completes 1 hour later |