Re: FATAL: stuck spinlock

From: Jakub Ouhrabka <jouh8664(at)ss1000(dot)ms(dot)mff(dot)cuni(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FATAL: stuck spinlock
Date: 2002-05-02 07:52:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0205020947440.14474-100000@u-pl1.ms.mff.cuni.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


I've forgotten that there were another max. 100 backends connected to
application databases doing nothing (idle) - connections from apache
connection pool on another server...

Is there anything I can do for further investigation?

thanks, kuba

> > > FATAL: s_lock(0x40361030) at lwlock.c:236, stuck spinlock. Aborting.
> >
> > Oh? That shouldn't happen. More details please?
>
> I don't know what is interesting for you but I'll try...
> ...

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-05-02 09:04:06 HOWTO - Random character generation for primary key
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-05-02 05:48:00 Re: Using views and MS access via odbc