Re: JDBC split and move ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <ryan(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC split and move ...
Date: 2002-02-11 02:09:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0202102106320.683-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> Actually, we're also discussing moving docs into a 'docs project' ...

Oh, I can see it now: half a dozen different projects with different
release cycles all scribbling on top of each other into a single
documentation source. And when one of those projects has a release, it
has the option of not shipping any documentation, or taking whatever
happens to be in the docs project right now, not knowing what the state of
the rest of the documentation is.

Separating documentation from what it is documenting is just such a bad
idea, I won't even consider it.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-02-11 02:11:19 Re: JDBC split and move ...
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-02-11 01:23:26 Re: JDBC split and move ...