Re: State of PL/Python build

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Bosma <andrew(at)corvus(dot)biomed(dot)brown(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: State of PL/Python build
Date: 2001-05-15 17:02:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0105151859350.757-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> I wonder whether people would like an option to statically link
> libperl.a and/or libpython.a into the Postgres backend proper? That
> would allow plperl/plpython to be used on platforms where this is an
> issue, without having to make a nonstandard build of perl/python.

Not unless you also link in plperl/plpython itself or mess with
-whole-archive type linker flags.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 17:09:14 Re: State of PL/Python build
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 16:59:44 Re: Configurable path to look up dynamic libraries