From: | "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Date: | 2001-06-15 17:07:56 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0106151205200.5630-100000@morannon.the-infinite.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > People have complained that we store passwords unencrypted in pg_shadow.
> > Long ago we agreed to a solution and I am going to try to implement that
> > next.
>
> Whatever you do, please wait till I've finished the "authenticate after
> fork" change. (this weekend?)
If you are going to do this this weekend, should I just wait with the PAM
patch until then? (Patch against the new code)
--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-15 17:16:10 | Protocol Documentation |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-15 16:27:02 | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |