On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> What about the other idea of just having committers wait for the next
> walwriter-cycle flush before reporting commit?
I haven't considered that too much yet; it may very well be superior to
anything I was thinking of. The only point I was trying to make today is
that I'd prefer not to see commit_delay excised until there's a superior
replacement for it that's suitable even for synchronous write situations.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD