pgpool question

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pgpool question
Date: 2005-03-09 17:10:25
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.62.0503091956470.26616@ra.sai.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433

I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and
pg801:5433 as second one. Pgpool is running on default port (9999) and
I configured my web application to use it, so I could start/stop backends
without disturbing client (web browser).

When I stop primary backend (pg74:5432) pgpool switched to backend
failover from (5432) to (5433) done
but when I start primary and stopped secondary backend pgpool
never switched back to primary backend as expected !
I see bogus message like:
starting failover from (5433) to (5433)

What I'm doing wrong ?

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Hoffmann 2005-03-09 17:23:29 Re: pgpool question
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-03-09 16:39:31 Re: One vacuum full is not enough.