Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2)

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marinos J(dot) Yannikos" <mjy(at)geizhals(dot)at>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2)
Date: 2005-02-03 19:50:53
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.62.0502032250240.20328@ra.sai.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marinos J. Yannikos" <mjy(at)geizhals(dot)at> writes:
>> I can't seem to find out where the bottleneck is, but it doesn't seem to
>> be CPU or disk. "top" shows that postgres processes are frequently in
>> this state:
>
>> 6701 postgres 16 0 204m 58m 56m S 9.3 0.2 0:06.96 semtimedo
>> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> What's the platform exactly (hardware and OS)?
>

it should be 'semtimedop'

> regards, tom lane
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Brown 2005-02-03 23:22:39 Re: Planner really hates nested loops
Previous Message Marinos J. Yannikos 2005-02-03 19:06:10 Re: GiST indexes and concurrency (tsearch2)