| From: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| Date: | 2007-02-16 07:02:33 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0702152300520.18849@resin.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have no strong opinion about how matches are returned. Seeing the
> definitional difficulties that you point out, it may be fine to return
> them unordered. But then all "matches" functions should do that.
>
> For the "split" functions, however, providing the order is clearly
> important.
Does this version sufficiently address your concerns?
--
Finagle's Creed:
Science is true. Don't be misled by facts.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| regexp-split-matches-documented_newapi.patch | text/plain | 50.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-02-16 07:36:09 | Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-16 06:01:14 | Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-02-16 12:19:55 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-16 05:49:06 | further bootstrap cleanup |