From: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
Date: | 2007-02-10 00:33:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0702091631080.28908@resin.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Neil Conway wrote:
> The "doing_srf" business is rather tortured, and seems an invitation for
> bugs. ISTM there should be a cleaner way to implement this. For example,
> would it be possible to put all the common logic into one or more
> additional functions, and then have SRF vs. non-SRF cases that call into
> those functions after doing the appropriate initialization?
Here is a new version of the patch which eliminates the doing_srf stuff.
It does seem a lot cleaner this way...
--
Fortune's Real-Life Courtroom Quote #18:
Q: Are you married?
A: No, I'm divorced.
Q: And what did your husband do before you divorced him?
A: A lot of things I didn't know about.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
regexp-split-matches-documented.patch | text/plain | 44.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-10 02:28:53 | Re: HOT for PostgreSQL 8.3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-10 00:31:56 | Re: Variable length varlena headers redux |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-02-10 06:57:46 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-02-09 22:46:06 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |