| From: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions |
| Date: | 2007-02-07 20:34:23 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0702071231570.28908@resin.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> writes:
> > * Put together a patch to add these functions to core. I could put them
> > directly in regexp.c, so the support functions could stay static. My
> > concern here is that I don't know if there are any functions currently
> > in core with OUT parameters.
>
> As of 8.2 there are.
Could you give me the name of one in pg_proc.h so I can see how I should
go about adding one there?
> If we are going to include these I would vote for core not contrib
> status, exactly to avoid having to export those functions.
OK, this patch will be my next project.
--
History is curious stuff
You'd think by now we had enough
Yet the fact remains I fear
They make more of it every year.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-07 20:37:24 | Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-07 20:04:47 | Re: Status of autovacuum and the sporadic stats failures ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-07 20:37:24 | Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-02-07 19:07:30 | Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions |