From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if |
Date: | 2006-05-05 00:14:20 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.63.0605041903060.19909@leary2.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local SSL installation hasn't
> got it. Per buildfarm failure on 'canary'.
>
It seems a little bit dangerous to just not check the CRL without so much
as a warning message. CRL support came around in openssl 0.9.7 which was
quite some time ago. Last time we discussed[1] this it looked like the
0.9.6 branch was still being maintained, but it's been over two years
since the last 0.9.6 release[2]. I'd suggest de-supporting 0.9.6 or some
sort of log message if there is a CRL file that we're not going to check.
Kris Jurka
[1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-07/msg00194.php
[2] http://www.openssl.org/news/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-05 01:16:14 | Re: pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local SSL installation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-04 22:18:39 | pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local SSL installation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-05 01:16:14 | Re: pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local SSL installation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-04 22:18:39 | pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local SSL installation |