Re: Avoiding explicit addDataType calls for PostGIS

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com>
Cc: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Avoiding explicit addDataType calls for PostGIS
Date: 2004-11-08 08:37:17
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.56.0411080331420.11414@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

> [use a property file to configure datatypes]
>

Looking at this patch again, I don't believe the JDBC driver should use
this extension mechanism to configure itself. The whole concept is error
prone with multiple .properties files, so why should we start things off
by creating a properties file when we don't need to.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian {Hamilton Kelly} 2004-11-08 08:41:56 Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.
Previous Message Klaas 2004-11-08 08:33:43 Re: I spoke with Marc from the postgresql mailing list.

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2004-11-08 08:50:08 Re: Avoiding explicit addDataType calls for PostGIS
Previous Message Barry Lind 2004-11-06 05:21:47 Re: 8.0.0beta4: "copy" and "client_encoding"