ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)
Date: 2000-01-24 04:54:25
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0001240052020.79710-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Chris Bitmead wrote:

> Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> > I'm sure many people would appreciate it even without "preserving oid-s"
> > as OID's are declared deprecated for (AFAIK) >2 years,
>
> OIDs should not be deprecated (never heard that one before). They will
> become more important if and when postgres moves more toward being an
> odbms. For reasons see any book on object theory and identity.

You are the second person that mentioned the ODBMS<->OID tie in ... when
you say ODBMS, is that the same as ORDBMS, or we talking a different
issue?

Want to elaborate? Like, since we already have the 'core', I believe,
what does it take to continue that trend?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-24 04:54:58 Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster)
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-01-24 04:39:38 Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping