Re: (A) native Windows port

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "HACKERS" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (A) native Windows port
Date: 2002-07-02 02:48:26
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEODCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > It would all work out of the box and would do wonderful things for the
> > Postgres community.
>
> I like this idea, but let me just bring one little issue to note: are you
> going to handle upgrades, and if so, how? How are you going to
> do a major
> version upgrade?

Well, the easiest way would be to get them to uninstall the old version
first, but I'm sure it can be worked out. Perhaps even we shouldn't
overwrite the old version anyway?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolas Bazin 2002-07-02 03:19:33 Re: (A) native Windows port
Previous Message Gunther Schadow 2002-07-01 23:11:10 Re: transfer data from oracle to postgres

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolas Bazin 2002-07-02 03:19:33 Re: (A) native Windows port
Previous Message David M. Kaplan 2002-07-02 01:25:18 aggregate that returns array