| From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |
| Date: | 2010-09-08 15:09:11 |
| Message-ID: | FE95C7DE-6759-4FAA-A083-ABB8D0F86421@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 8, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Neat. Have you checked what effect this has on memory consumption?
>>
>> Also, don't forget to add it to
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>
> Would be good to have the patch updated to be against HEAD before
> posting to the commitfest.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
we will definitely provide something which is for HEAD.
but, it seems the problem we are looking is not sufficiently fixed yet.
in our case we shaved off some 18% of planning time or so - looking at the other top 2 functions i got the feeling that more can be done to reduce this. i guess we have to attack this as well.
regards,
hans
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-09-08 15:26:55 | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-09-08 14:57:12 | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |