Re: latest hstore patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: latest hstore patch
Date: 2009-10-02 18:42:56
Message-ID: FA4D0540-2F96-409B-9E66-B79E5C7B0A0C@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 2, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Well, if it is just changed syntax, we could wack around the system
> catalogs. If storage changes, we have to dump/reload that data type.

Andrew solved this problem for hstore by making the new version able
to read the old representation. It will also update to the new
representation when you update a value.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-10-02 18:44:54 Re: latest hstore patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-02 18:38:18 Re: LIMIT 1 == EXISTS optimization?