Re: Precision of data types and functions

From: "Brandon Aiken" <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Precision of data types and functions
Date: 2006-09-01 18:33:39
Message-ID: F8E84F0F56445B4CB39E019EF67DACBA21F665@exchsrvr.winemantech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Of course the year exists. The date itself is nonsensical, however.

'January 3, 648' does reference a valid day, but the date itself has no
meaning at that time in the world, so there is very little meaning in
using Gregorian dates except to give us a relativistic idea of when it
occurred. Nevertheless, you can never say with specificity anything
that occurred on any given date prior to the inception of the Gregorian
calendar without doing conversions to a calendar no longer in use while
taking into account the numerous error corrections that have been made
to various calendars. Knowing the year and season something happened is
about the best that can be expected.

--
Brandon Aiken
CS/IT Systems Engineer

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 2:27 PM
To: Brandon Aiken
Cc: pgsql general
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Precision of data types and functions

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 13:24, Brandon Aiken wrote:
> > Now, MySQL's design to 9-fill fields when you try to enter a
too-large
> > number is, in fact, stupid on MySQL's part. I consider that silent
> > truncation. Heck, MySQL lets you create a date on February 31st, or
> > prior to the year 1500, both of which are obviously nonsensical.
>
> What's nonsensical about a date before the year 1500??? it's not like
> that didn't exist or something.
> The Gregorian calendar was established in the 1500's by Pope Gregory,
> so, no, those dates did not exist.

That makes no sense whatsoever. Just because the calendar is a somewhat
modern invention doesn't mean that the year 45 BC doesn't exist... How
else are we to keep track of dates from before that time? Switch to the
Mayan calendar? I'm pretty sure no one's made a Mayan Calendar
extension for PostgreSQL (or any other database) just yet.

test=> insert into test values ('1023-04-12 BC');
INSERT 2124397005 1
test=> insert into test values ('1023-04-12');
INSERT 2124397005 1
test=> select * from test;
t
------------------------
1023-04-12 00:00:00
1023-04-12 00:00:00 BC
(2 rows)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2006-09-01 18:37:10 Re: Precision of data types and functions
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-09-01 18:28:50 Re: pg_statistic corruption and duplicated primary keys