Re: queriing the version of libpq

From: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>
To: PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: queriing the version of libpq
Date: 2010-10-07 15:07:33
Message-ID: F694F3B3-BAD2-49A4-8D60-C13115F37903@themactionfaction.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 12:23 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> This is really something that psycopg2 should work out for you. I
>> suggest you take up a discussion on this on their mailing list.
>
> ...which is down over the last 3 weeks or so:
>
> http://www.initd.org/

In addition, I posted a patch for 9.0 support which was supposed to be rolled in to psycopg2 weeks ago. Now I am stuck pushing my own psycopg2 egg around. The psycopg2 project is too reliant on one person (who has trouble managing his servers)- I wish he would move the project to a public project management service.

I also remember a discussion on the poor state of postgresql drivers for python and which driver the PostgreSQL project should endorse- it looks like the situation has not improved. Here's the thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00351.php

Cheers,
M

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-07 15:33:22 Re: PostgreSQL 7.4.16 is creating strange files under /var/lib/pgsql
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-10-07 15:07:09 Re: pg_relation_size / could not open relation with OID #

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vincenzo Romano 2010-10-07 15:10:40 Re: On Scalability
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-10-07 15:07:18 Re: On Scalability