Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint

>
> I think Simon Riggs is already working on that idea. This one is
> fairly easy to implement. I think these are some of the features
> only a time-stamp based database can implement. I think database
> standards were formed during the time, when the data consistency
> was provided with Lock based mechanisms. And moreover i have
> already committed on the indexes with snapshot and i am still
> waiting for its approval from hackers. If that does go through,
> then i need to work on the reverse mapping hash tables, which is
> really a long task. So i may not be able to take up time-travel now.

if i remember my last talk with Simon correctly the idea is to have
timetravel across transactions.
having this feature inside a transaction will not make it into CVS as
it is basically of no practical use.
i would suggest to put some effort into making it work across
transactions. just saving the snapshot is not enough
here - there are a couple of other things which have to be taken into
consideration (transaction wraparound, etc.)

if you want to work on timetravel my team and i can provide some
assistance as we wanted to help in this area anyway.

best regards,

hans

--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26, 2700 Wiener Neustadt
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql.at, www.cybertec.at