Re: Buildfarm alarms

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Joachim Wieland" <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm alarms
Date: 2006-09-26 09:51:53
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40176D04A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Dave Page
> Sent: 26 September 2006 10:41
> To: Michael Meskes
> Cc: Joachim Wieland; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm alarms
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> > Sent: 26 September 2006 10:39
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Joachim Wieland; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm alarms
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > OK, I now see just one, date format related failure:
> > > ...
> >
> > Did you run it with Joachim's patch or with up-to-date CVS
> > checkout? It
> > seems to me that you do not have the latest changes to CVS.
> We added a
> > "set datestyle" to variable.pgc that should fix this failure.
>
> No, I used Joachim's patch as anoncvs hadn't caught up. I'll run it
> again - thanks.

Yep - passes all tests now :-)

Thanks, Dave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2006-09-26 10:16:54 Block B-Tree concept
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-09-26 09:40:43 Re: Buildfarm alarms