Re: Database performance comparison paper.

From: Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net>
To: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Database performance comparison paper.
Date: 2007-02-18 18:07:57
Message-ID: E67B8518-A875-4CFF-85E4-C42453E41353@event-s.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Am 15.02.2007 um 13:05 schrieb Alexander Elgert:

> Nice, but it would be interesting which storage engine was used for
> mysql - ok, default is MyIsam.

They used MyISAM as it is described late in the paper.

cug

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-18 18:08:21 Re: complex referential integrity constraints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-18 17:54:26 Re: Why *exactly* is date_trunc() not immutable ?