From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_execute_from_file review |
Date: | 2010-12-07 21:30:11 |
Message-ID: | E5827EF1-E589-42FF-8237-5906031E9262@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 7, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Anyway, in a less blue-sky vein: we could fix some of these problems by
>> having an explicit relocatable-or-not property for extensions. If it is
>> relocatable, it's required to keep all its owned objects in the target
>> schema, and ALTER EXTENSION .. SET SCHEMA is allowed; else not. This
>> does nothing for the fix-the-search_path-property problem, though.
>
> The search_path is the complex (as in AI complete) part of it, but given
> your idea here, we could make it so that only the non-relocatable
> extensions benefit from the @extschema@ placeholder.
+1
That might be an appropriate compromise.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-07 21:50:13 | Re: pg_execute_from_file review |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-12-07 21:29:15 | Re: Review: Extensions Patch |