Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: bob parker <bob_parker(at)dodo(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "John Wells" <jb(at)sourceillustrated(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-09 01:00:19
Message-ID: E1A7PAC-0000Vu-00@debian
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 01:28, John Wells wrote:
> Yes, I know you've seen the above subject before, so please be gentle with
> the flamethrowers.
>
> I'm preparing to enter a discussion with management at my company
> regarding going forward as either a MySql shop or a Postgresql shop.
>
> It's my opinion that we should be using PG, because of the full ACID
> support, and the license involved. A consultant my company hired before
> bringing me in is pushing hard for MySql, citing speed and community
> support, as well as ACID support.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2003-10-09 01:12:29 Re:
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-10-09 00:59:45 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)