Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on
Date: 2018-04-18 17:02:38
Message-ID: E174F2D9-4D1E-4C12-A79C-33182CB490CA@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On April 18, 2018 9:50:48 AM PDT, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> wrote:
>On 04/18/2018 12:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> Please change the name of the "JIT" parameter to something meaningful
>> to humans before this gets too far into the wild.
>>
>> SSL is somewhat understandable because its not a Postgres-private
>term.
>
>JIT is hardly a Postgres-private term. It's a familiar term in a
>widespread community, though I might cede the point that the
>community in question is more compiler wonks than DBAs.

You're right. There's another thread where we discussed this. Also due to concern of Simon's. Can we not do so separately here?

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2018-04-18 17:10:53 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2018-04-18 16:52:26 Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery