From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Date: | 2008-01-28 11:25:45 |
Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57902B63227@m0143.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> >> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.
>
> > I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
> > "synchronized_seqscans"?
>
> We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.
Yes looks good, how about synchronized_seqscan without plural ?
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-01-28 12:16:12 | Re: Proposal: Integrity check |
Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2008-01-28 10:37:03 | Re: plperl: Documentation on BYTEA decoding is wrong |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-01-28 12:51:31 | WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-28 09:25:51 | Re: sinval contention reduction |