Re: postgresql vs mysql

From: "Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com>
To: "Ron Johnson" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
Date: 2007-02-22 01:01:44
Message-ID: DAF7A2046DD4A24F8F77B086F840BF1907FE83EF@msx11am.matrixone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>> How would you like to use a database that has nuances like these --
>> http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?20,141120,141120#msg-141120

---

> Huh?
> A blank string (does that mean '' or ' '?) is not NULL, so of
> *course* it should pass the NOT NULL constraint.
> Or am I missing something?

---

I agree with you, although Oracle won't, they really blurred the line
between the empty string and NULL.

As for MySQL maybe this article makes more sense:
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mysql/article.php/3519116

Mike.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2007-02-22 01:05:20 Re: postgresql vs mysql
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2007-02-22 00:18:15 Re: postgresql vs mysql