| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-07-14 04:34:40 |
| Message-ID: | DAED3BD2-A1BC-46B0-A712-D3E80859D196@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I disagree. Adding a column is certainly changing the structure, as is
> removing one. This certainly hasn't changed my opinion that it's
> worthwhile to consider this change, even at this point in the release
> cycle, given we need to make a change regardless.
Without getting into the substantive question here, I think that as a matter of policy, when somebody thinks we're whacking things around too much post-beta, we should lean in the direction of whacking them around less. You don't have to agree with Peter on the merits to think that this is optional tinkering. It clearly is.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-07-14 05:22:17 | Fix typo in postgres_fdw/deparse.c |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-07-14 03:06:16 | Re: Improving executor performance - tidbitmap |