Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Date: 2008-11-20 01:07:25
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F894415470100128D@postal.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:05 PM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Mark Wong; Tom Lane; Heikki Linnakangas; Gregory Stark; Josh
> Berkus; Greg Smith; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Simple postgresql.conf wizard
>
> > Yes, please test something. I am tired if us saying we need to
> increase
> > default_statistics_target, but because we don't know the magic
> number,
> > we do nothing release after release.
>
> I think the idea that there IS a magic number is the problem.
>
> No amount of testing is ever going to refute the argument that, under
> some other workload, a different value might better.
>
> But that doesn't amount to a reason to leave it the way it is.

Perhaps a table of experimental data could serve as a rough guideline.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-11-20 03:53:52 Re: Cool hack with recursive queries
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-11-20 01:06:40 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1197)