Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <
heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> On 13.07.2012 02:00, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Heikki Linnakangas<
>> heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)**enterprisedb(dot)com<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. Can you do something about TrickFunctionCall2, please? (
>>> http://archives.postgresql.****org/message-id/4FE2C968.**
>>> 2010503(at)enterprisedb(dot)com<http:**//archives.postgresql.org/**
>>> message-id/4FE2C968(dot)2010503(at)**enterprisedb(dot)com<http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4FE2C968.2010503@enterprisedb.com>
>>> >)
>>>
>>> A separate patch to refactor that in the existing gist opclass would
>>> probably be best.
>>>
>>
>> Done. There are separate patch for get rid of TrickFunctionCall2 and
>> version of SP-GiST for ranges based on that patch.
>>
>
> Committed the get-rid-of-TrickFunctionCall2 patch. I also changed one call
> in range_gist_same(), which was not using TrickFunctionCall2 but was
> nevertheless doing the same thing in spirit.
>

Good, thanks!

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.