Re: alternative back-end block formats

From: Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: alternative back-end block formats
Date: 2014-01-28 18:33:18
Message-ID: CAPfS4Zxd9bpDdZaq64CkgPCj=am8f88ocTT_PEFb5uXxexfoGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> TBH, I'd rather we waited till the commitfest is over. This is certainly
> material for 9.5, if not even further out, so there's no pressing need for
> a debate right now; and we have plenty of stuff we do need to deal with
> right now.

Works for me. I'll just lurk in the meantime, and see what I can figure
out. Thanks.

- Christian

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-01-28 18:35:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] GSoC 2014 - mentors, students and admins
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2014-01-28 18:29:33 Re: jsonb and nested hstore